What do you think of this muzzle from Pretty Pervy? It’s a good cute likeness and emphasises the puppy aspects (leaving room for a hood and collar) without costing the earth like the Mr. S leather doggy hood.
What do you think of this muzzle from Pretty Pervy? It’s a good cute likeness and emphasises the puppy aspects (leaving room for a hood and collar) without costing the earth like the Mr. S leather doggy hood.
Thought I’d do a quick round up of some of the better rubber retailers I’ve come across of late – mostly as an aide-memoire but helpful to some I’m sure.
Kinky Clothes
Someone told me about this place – they do a good line in hood, masks and breath control gear, as well as some interesting rubber items.
Breathless
Just for a change, a range of boyz rubber gear that isn’t run of the mill. They do their own stuff plus lines by the likes of Skin Two and TG. Have a shop up in Camden.
Invinvible Rubber
Good value basic items, plus some more interesting items, including great coloured rubber designs.
How about this for a second take?
It was posed in a comment in my first posting about where I’d have it placed; somewhere visible or not? Firstly, I’ll have to explain that I can’t have it done on my arse or legs – due to my Crohn’s disease, I have a lot stretch marks there. Having it on my stomach is probably a bad idea due to, er, future expansion…
This leaves my arms, my shoulder blades or my flanks really. Here, have a handy diagram:
It was also asked – why? Not sure, I like the idea of being marked as my Master’s property, but I don’t want something as twee as "Sir’s Boi" or something. The barcode is advantageous because it lends itself to the objectification of me as a slave but it’s also Master independent, not that I have any intention of changing Masters!
I’ve recently been mulling over getting a tattoo – not that I’ve mentioned it to anyone yet, let alone my master. This is the first public outing.
I don’t want any ordinary tattoo either – I want something that shows I’m owned. Collars are great, but they’re uncomfortable to wear, or at least sleep in, and they do rather show at work (I wear t-shirt and jeans normally).
I have a Slave Register Number – 000-275-771, and I want to work this into my ownership tattoo. Firstly, the slave register themselves have my number in barcode form:
Secondly, I can take the same number and just create a regular EAN barcode (the 2672 designates that this code is an internal or private one – therefore, I can be sure I’m not labelled as a tin of beans or something):
Lastly, I could create a pawprint and append the slave register number beneath it (use your imagination for the number). This has the added advantage of conveying my puppy side as well, but is less "objectified":
I’m thinking of a combination of 1 & 3, so something like:
But maybe with a bit of tweaking and on a slightly cuter scale. Thoughts in the comments if you would be so kind :)
An interesting little titbit:
When asked have I tied someone up or been tied up during sex? 58% of men and 62% of women answered yes.
Maybe all those Ann Summers shops on UK high streets are to blame :)
Have just finished sorting out the arrangements to stay in Berlin over the winter holidays. We have a lovely apartment which comes with a large playroom :)
So, anyone who wants to play in December in Berlin – let us know!
Just a couple of days late in writing this up, but the 5 months mark has passed. Not had any troubles whatsoever in the last few weeks, although it’s stil not stretched up enough.
Maybe at the 6 months stage I’ll go and ruin it by putting a larger piece of metal in!
BBC NEWS | UK | Ban on violent net porn planned
In the news this morning comes Government plans to make it illegal to posess pornography depicting "violence or pain". I’m all for the prohibition of material like bestiality and necrophilia, however I am seriously concerned that this impinges into the BD/SM world.
Within the UK, we have draconian laws regarding what may happen within the confines of a bedroom/playroom between two consenting adults. The main issue is how the law is phrased – you may not do anything if it results in marks or injuries which are more than "transient and trifling".
Therefore, a severe flogging that leaves bruises for a week may well be classed as an illegal assault. Mild CP that leaves a red arse for a few hours is unlikely to be considered as an assault. Bondage, mummification, watersports and shaving do not fall into these areas and are therefore considered "safe" activites.
I want to take a moment to point out that pain in general as well caning/whipping/flogging, needle play and the like don’t really float my boat, however there are many people who do enjoy them as part of a consensual relationship.
As an example, the Home Office discussion paper (available through the BBC, PDF format) mentions the following scene as something they want to put pay to:
5. It is not possible in a public
document like this to give a great deal of
graphic detail or description of the
material in question. However, we can say
that there are hundreds of internet sites
offering a wide range of material featuring
the torture of (mostly female) victims who
are tied to some kind of apparatus or
restrained in other ways and stabbed with
knives, hooks and other implements.
As well as:
...some material contains sexualised images of
women hanging by their necks from meat
hooks, some with plastic bags over their
heads.
"It is not possible in a public document like this to give a great deal of graphic detail" – perhaps not, but you’re going to have be graphic in the wording of your new law so as not to make such a mess as the current legislation regarding BD/SM.
I would humbly suggest that the current Victoriana of sexual offences should be reviewed before imposing "nanny state" (I hate that phrase, but it works here) legislation on a community that does no harm (except to each other ). How about this for a nice and easy starting point:
You can do what you want with whoever you want as long as it’s consenual.
Obviously children, animals and the dead aren’t covered , so I assume that pretty much drops us at the point we’re at now. Several hundered years of legislation condensed into one sentence.
Not a new themed branch of Starbucks apparently, but rather a coffee shop with a twist. Perhaps I should check it out the next time I happen to be in (horrible) town.
If you’ve been, leave a comment here won’t you.